Being a lecturette given by J.Fall before the Second-year class upwards at the Christian Brothers' High School, Highgate, and being the winning lecture out of forty entries. Delivered on December the tenth, 1942

Mr Chairman, Brother Keenan, and Gentlemen. Take another example: The capitalist sits by the fire, while the

pauper stands outside in the rain. It is not necessary for the rich During these days of strife, slaughter and unsettlement we all man to ask the poor man in to sit by his fire but it would not harm realise that there must be some changes in the government of our him to allow him to stand on his verandah, where he could shelter country. One of these changes, which I propose to discuss, is the from the rain. There the poor man could stay until the rain ceased. provision of at least a percentage of the money used to finance the Then he could once more step out into the street and go on his way. war for peaceful objects after the war. By this action on the part of the capitalist, the poor man is saved

from the rain and does not get wet. Also, the capitalist neither gains Before talking about the money which I hope will be produced, I nor loses by allowing him to stand there. wish to talk about the money which is being lent, or produced, to finance the present war today. However, this is not the method of the capitalist for, if it was, he

would probably not be a capitalist at all. The capitalist would During the time of war many instruments are built, which require require the poor man to pay a rent, according to the length of time much money. Bombs, guns, tanks and many other implements are he used his verandah. Thus he would make a private gain and it built solely for the purpose of war. In the Great War, the British would be then, and only then, that he would permit the man to government was spending over four million pounds per day. shelter there. Already, in this war, the British government is spending over ten million pounds per day. And so if shown the method of the capitalist: He will lend money

to another who is in need of it only if his own safety counts on it, Of this money, at least one-fifth is destroyed: that is, the products if he can get a hold over the other person, or if he can make private built by the money are destroyed. This means that about two million gain. pounds per day is being destroyed. It is for this reason that our government now asks us for the sum of one hundred million Why is this money not produced in times of peace? pounds, twice a year.

As has been seen, the capitalist will not provide it, and the working-Because this money is being produced for war, the capitalist, or man can't provide it. The capitalist could provide it if he wished to, rich man, does not mind producing it. He supplies it because, in but he does not wish to. doing so, he brings the end to the war nearer, and lessens his danger of being actually engaged in warfare. Why will the capitalist not provide the money?

How is this money produced in times of war? He might not provide it because he can see no use for the money if

it was provided, but this is not the general reason. The capitalist During the time of war, this money is produced or supplied by the does not want to provide the money because he is afraid of losing people themselves, both directly and indirectly. his power. He is afraid that the other man will become greater than

he - afraid that he will lose some of his money. By saying that the money is produced directly, I mean that it is actually supplied by the giving of the people. This is usually done Indeed, he will quite willingly lose some of his money if, in doing by means of War Savings Certificates and National War Bonds. so, he can tread down an opponent, but, if he is doing the opposite

bringing up an opponent - he will not lend the money. By saying that the money is produced indirectly I mean that it is obtained by the government through taxes on all goods and other `Perhaps,' you might say, `he would provide it to the government such means. for improvements.' This illustrates how the money is obtained to finance the present war. He might provide it, but there would be a chance of the government

improving the conditions of the poor. This would give them more Is this money produced in times of peace? power and they, being opposed to capitalistic power, would

endeavour to overthrow him. Hence, he will not lend the money. No, it is not produced in times of peace, although it should be This shows why the money is not produced. produced. The capitalist produces money only for the reason that it is necessary for his own liberty. However, if he does not suffer, he Could this money be produced? will not lend the money to relieve those who are suffering. His motto is: Myself, and nothing but myself. Yes, it could be produced. That is, the rich men could be taxed by

the government, and the money thus received could be utilised to If he would not benefit by lending the money, he would not lend it. improve the country's position and other such means. He would lend so as to obtain a hold over another person or firm, but if he is unable to obtain that hold he will not lend the money. Another means of obtaining the money is as follows: The govern

ment could establish a bank all proceeds of which, instead of going to the Head-men, or capitalists, would go to the relief of the poor.

653

APPENDICES A: THE PRINCIPAL'S CUP SPEECH 1942

Slums could be forbidden, and a law could be passed compelling the Why is there this lack of employment opportunity? owners to rebuild them under modern hygienic conditions.

Firstly, because there are not enough positions to be filled; and, `The people would not stand for it,' you say. `They would revolt secondly because many of the men are not highly skilled enough to against the government.' fill those positions that are vacant. The second reason could be

greatly overcome by better education for everyone. That is, if a By this statement, what do you mean by People? Do you mean The person was talented and wished to become a doctor, and could not Rich? The poor? or Everyone? afford it, he should still be able to become one, irrespective of the

money involved. All education should continue until a person is Surely the poor would not revolt because, if the system were sixteen years of age. introduced, it would work for their benefit. They would not revolt from something that was working for them. Then, since the poor What kind of government works could improve employment would not revolt, it is clear that Everyone could not revolt, so we opportunity? are left with The Rich. If anyone did revolt, these would be the persons to revolt, because their power would gradually be taken Well, for instance, consider the middle of Australia. As we know, away from them. this land is a vast desert,, owing to lack of rain. Could not the

government set about and carry a pipe, or something of the sort, to But, even if they did revolt, could they stand up against the vast this area, and flood it? The country around the flooded area would majority of the working-man? The capitalist, although he owns become fertile. Thus Australia would be able to support a far everything, forms but a small percentage of the total population. greater number of persons. Australia would also become a greater The result might be a civil war between the capitalists and the primary producing country than ever. working-men.

Many people would say that that the achievement would be too `However,' you would say, `if the capitalists were overruled, who great, and that it could not be done. However, if the government set could lend the money to the government? its mind on it and used a great number of the unemployed, that

achievement would not prove too great to be accomplished. This statement forgets the point that, although the capitalist is overruled, his industries remain. It is not the capitalist that produces Again, money could be used to finance war: the money, but the industries, which he controls. These industries could still produce money, therefore the money could still be War against disease produced. War against plague and

War against insects.

To what use could this money be put?

In fact, the more money we lend or give to this kind of war, the There are no end of uses for this money. First, the money could be better. used for government improvements. This would find work for many of the unemployed. If men were supplied with every piece of equipment necessary,

many inventions would be made. Again, the war against disease Very few people realise the number of unemployed persons in the would lessen the amount of illness and, as illness is a cause of world. According to the International Labour Report of 1933, in unemployment, the number would be more greatly lessened. December 1932, the number of unemployed in each country was as

and in other countries a further 12 million.

This makes a total of 23,412,861 persons unemployed! A later report in 1935 stated that there were 25 million people unemployed in the world.

The State would not own all industry, but each man would own part of his trade. Some men would be richer than others, but these would be taxed to help the poorer. The State would be an organisation for the people, not as in communism, the people for the State.

Bringing this closer to home, we find that in Australia in 1921 there The State with the money could strive to do its utmost for its were 137,675 persons unemployed. In 1933 this number was people. 495,269.

The poor people, who could not afford it, would not be taxed, So it is seen that the number had trebled. Also, if we go back whereas the rich people, who could afford it would be taxed to help further, we find that the number in 1921 was three times that in the poor people. It would not be fair to tax all, because the poor 1911. This shows that there is a great increase in the number of could not be taxed when they do not have enough money. It would unemployed. also be stupid to tax the poor to help the poor, and would be like

asking a man to subscribe to a collection which was being taken up What is the cause of this unemployment? for that man.

This may be answered by analysing the number of unemployed in In conclusion, I hope that from this lecturette everyone present sees 1933. The reason, and the number unemployed for that reason, is the urgent need for this money to be produced after this war for the as follows: numerous improvements I have mentioned.

Lack of employment opportunity: 355,935. Illness: 17,233; Industrial dispute: 1,526. These, with other smaller causes make up the total number.

In previous years, all causes, except the first, remained fairly constant, while that of the first has greatly increased. It may be said that 90% of Australia's unemployment is due to lack of employment opportunity.

654

APPENDIX B

Report in "THE RECORD" 11 February, 1943

Christian Brothers' High School,

Highgate, was the successful candidate

for the award of the Lynn Scholarship.

1942.

The number of applicants was the largest since the Scholarship was

board a difficult task. The Scholarship

provides £30 a year for three years at

a registered secondary school, and £50

for three years at the University.

Officer V. G. Fall, R.A.F.V.R. His

father, who in civilian life was an

auditor and inspector for Millar's

Timber and Trading Co., is now a

prisoner of war in Java. At the 1942

Junior University Examinations, John,

obtained a pass in nine subjects

English, Latin, Maths. A, Maths. B,

Chemistry, Physics, History,

Geography, Bookkeeping and

Commercial Methods.

subjects he excels.

The Headmaster's report is as follows:

in the ankles, John is not able to indulge in sport. Nevertheless he evinces keen

" I have had the pleasure of knowing interest in the sporting activities of the

Master John Fall since his admittance to school, and usually performs duties of

this school in January, 1939, and I scorer or time-keeper. His general health

gladly testify to his excellent moral is good.

character. A very conscientious boy,

his conduct has always been " He is liked by his companions, and is

irreproachable, and his sense of listened to with great respect by them

propriety, more than usually developed when stating his view of a question or

by careful home training, has saved him a subject in class discussion.

from many of the faults common to

656
APPENDIX C
3	John Victor Fall married Kathleen Mary Melson
4	Thomas Raithby Melson married Jemima Richardson
5	Joseph Melson married Violet Allerton
6	William Allerton married Annie Emily Cater
7	Victor George Fall married Dorothy Rumble
8	Henry Euean Rumble married Grace Martha Humfrey
9	Harry Humfrey Rumble married Kate Rosaline Knight
10	Anthony Knight married Letitia Ho Chee
	Henry St.John Knight married Mary Pocock
11	John Ho Chee married Charlotte Mole
12	Daniel Welch married Susan Chamberlaine
13	Chamberlain Mole married Martha Milton
14	Harry Humfrey Rumble to his descendants
15	Herbert Montague Rumble to his descendants
16	Ernest Duncan Rumble to his descendants
17	John Euean Rumble to his descendants

659

APPENDIX C: FAMILY ANCESTRY AND DESCENDANCY CHARTS

ANCESTRY CHART OF THE CHILDREN OF JOHN & KAY FALL PATERNAL BRANCH

+Q5:Edward FALL Rev (1779-1859) +Q4:James FALL (1817-1878)

644444444444444444444444444447 5 NOTE: 5 5 All Upward lines lead to 5

* .Q5:Mary UNKNOWN (?-1852) +Q3:George Edward FALL (1850-1917) * * +)5:George TOWNSHEND (?-?)

5 the person's father. 5 5 All Downward lines lead to 5 5 the person's mother. 5

* .Q4:Louisa TOWNSHEND (?-1901) 944444444444444444444444444448

*

.)5:UNKNOWN (?-?) +Q2:Victor George FALL (1902-1974) +))King Edward I * * +)4:John MCNAMARA (?-?) Thomas DE BROTHERTON (1300-1338)

*

.)3:Emily Louise MCNAMARA (1870-?) * .))Margaret of France

* .)4:UNKNOWN (?-?) * +)1:John Victor FALL (1928-) many ** +)5:Thomas RUMBLE (1799-1856) Generations ** +)4:Henry Euean RUMBLE (1834-1902) later ** **+)6:Thomas DE BROTHERTON (?-?)S))))))-

**

*.)5:Frances Mary DE BROTHERTON (1791-1867)

**

* .)6:UNKNOWN (?-?) * * +)3:Harry Humfrey RUMBLE (1866-1948) **** +)10:Thomas HUMFREY (?-1695) **** +) 9:John HUMFREY (?-1736) **** * .)10:Mary STACEY (?-?) **** +)8:Thomas HUMFREY (?-1733) **** *.) 9:Ann ILBURY (?-?) **** +)7:Thomas HUMFREY (?-1788) **** *.)8:Eleanor YOUEN (?-?) +))))))))))))))))))))))))), **** +)6:Thomas HUMFREY (1756-1836) * THE NUMBER BEFORE * **** *.)7:Jane GAMMON (?-?) * EACH NAME SHOWS THE * * * * * +)5:Joseph HUMFREY (1795-1842) *GENERATION LEVEL RELATIVE* * * * * * .)6:Hannah LOWSLEY (?-?) * TO THAT OF JOHN FALL *

* * * .)4:Grace Martha HUMFREY (1838-1894) .)))))))))))))))))))))))))-

*** .)5:Martha LOWSLEY (?-?)

*

.)2:Dorothy RUMBLE (1900-1988) ** +)7:Valentine KNIGHT (?-?) ** +)6:Valentine KNIGHT (1754-?)

*

* *.)7:Ann UNKNOWN (?-?) * * +)5:Valentine KNIGHT (1792-1867)

*

* *.)6:Mary UNKNOWN (?-?) * *+)4:Anthony KNIGHT (1831-1912) * ***+)6:William WATSON (1773?-1857)

*

**.)5:Elizabeth WATSON (1802-1895)

*

** .)6:UNKNOWN (?-?)

*

.)3:Kate Rosaline KNIGHT (1866-1932) * *+)6:HO Foo (Mandarin) (?-?) * *+)5:Ho Chee (John) (1789-1869)

*

**.)6:UNKNOWN (?-?)

*

.)4:Letitia Charlotte HOCHEE (1834-1920) * *+)7:James MOLE (1747-1821) * *+)6:Chamberlain MOLE (1764-1816) * *** +11:Edward WELCH (?-1666) * *** +10:William WELCH (1642-1719) * *** **+)12:John MERRITON (?-1642) * *** *.11:Katherine MERRITON (1603-1673) * *** * .)12:Margaret UNKNOWN (?-1665) * *** +) 9:Daniel WELCH (1686-1728) * *** *.10:Frances UNKNOWN (?-1708) * ***+)8:Daniel WELCH (1719-1749) * ****.) 9:Susan HAMMOND (?-1743)

*

**.)7:Susanna WELCH (1746-1782) * ** *+) 9:John CHAMBERLAINE (?-1716)

*

** .)8:Susan CHAMBERLAINE (1719-1777)

*

** .) 9:Elizabeth HOULGATE (1682-1765)

*

.)5:Charlotte MOLE (1805-1882) * *+)8:Joseph MILTON (?-1747) * *+)7:James MILTON (1734-1815)

*

**.)8:Mary UNKNOWN (?-1777)

*

.)6:Martha MILTON (1768-1847)

R .)7:Sarah KENT (?-1802) (2):Peter John FALL (1957- ) (2):Judith Anne Fall (1955- )

660

APPENDIX C

ANCESTRY CHART OF THE CHILDREN OF JOHN & KAY FALL MATERNAL BRANCH

(2):Judith Anne Fall (1955- )

(2)TPeter John FALL (1957- ) * +)5:Joshua MELSON * +)4:Joshua MELSON (1831 - ?)

*

*.)5:Maria UNKNOWN * +)3:Thomas Raithby MELSON (1863- ?) * **+)5:Thomas RAITHYBY

*

*.)4:Mary Raithby (1837 - ?)

*

* .)5:Susan UNKOWN * +)2:Joseph MELSON (1899-1966) *** +)5:John RICHARDSON * * * +)4:John RICHARDSON (1822- 1893) * * * * .)5:UNKNOWN

*

* .)3:Jemima Polly (Jenny) RICHARDSON (1864-1949)

** .)4:Jemima HARRISON (1826- ?)

.)1:Kathleen Mary MELSON (1926- ) * +)4:Thomas Castleton ALLERTON (?-?) * +)3:William Thomas Edward ALLERTON (1873-1957)

* * .)4:Maryann KING (?-?)

.)2:Violet Olive ALLERTON (1902-1991) * +)4:Edward CATER (?-?) .)3:Annie Emily CATER (1879-1951)

* +)5:Edward SMITH (?-?)

.)4:Mary Elizabeth SMITH (1854- ?) * +)6:William WELLS (1778- ?) .)5:Sarah WELLS (1821- ?)

.)6:Ann PITCHER (1780- ?)

Dates and Numbering System

In all the charts that follow, the date following a person's name gives their year of birth. However, a date of death, where given, is shown, for example, as follows: (d. 1695)

Each name is preceded by a number either in the form of 1:, 2: , 3:, .... or (2) , (3) .... This indicates the generational position of that person relative to John Fall. Those of the same generation as John Fall are all numbered 1:

Those one generation earlier than John Fall (eg, his parents and uncles) are all numbered 2: Persons in the next generation back (eg, grandparents) are numbered 3: , and so on.

Persons one generation later than John Fall (eg, his children) are numbered (2). Those who are two generations later ( eg, grandchildren) are numbered (3) , and so on.

661

APPENDIX C: FAMILY ANCESTRY AND DESCENDANCY CHARTS

DESCENDANCY CHART - FALL BRANCH 1

5:Edward FALL Rev (1779) sp-5:Mary UNKNOWN (1778)

T 1*))))Q 4:Edward FALL (1809) * 2/))))Q 4:Emma FALL (1811)

* sp-4:Joseph MAJURY

* 3/))))Q 4:Rebekah FALL (1812)

* sp-4:Henry ANGUS Rev * 4/))))Q 4:Hannah FALL (1814)

* 5/))))Q 4:Thomas FALL (1816)

* sp-4:Sarah BRADFORD

* 6/))))Q 4:James FALL (1817)

*

sp-4:Louisa TOWNSHEND

*

T +)))))))))))))))))))))))))), * 1/)))Q 3:George Edward FALL (1850) * McNAMARA BRANCH page 661 *

** sp1-3:UNKNOWN .)))))))))))0))))))))))))))- ** *

** sp2-3:Emily Louise MCNAMARA (1870)S)))))))))))))))-

* *T

** 1/)))Q 2:Donald Townshend FALL (1900)

*

** sp-2:Kathleen (Pat) UNKNOWN * * * +)))))))))))))))))))))))))), ** 2/)))Q 2:Marjorie Louisa FALL (1901) * RUMBLE BRANCH 2 page 668 *

*

** sp-2:John BENNETT * **

** 3.)))Q 2:Victor George FALL (1902)

.))))))))))))0)))))))))))))- * *

** sp-2:Dorothy RUMBLE (1900)S))))))))))))))))-

** T * * * +)))))))))))))))))))))))), * * .))))))))1 FALL BRANCH 2 page 660 *

* * .))))))))))))))))))))))))- **

*

2/)))Q 3:Lucy FALL

*

3/)))Q 3:Laura FALL **

*

4.)))Q 3:Thomas FALL

*

sp-3:UNKNOWN

*T

* 1.)))Q 2:Thomas FALL

* 7/))))Q 4:Mary Ann FALL (1820)

* sp-4:J NICHOLSON *

8.))))Q 4:Susanna FALL (1822) sp-4:J BUCHANAN

662

APPENDIX C

DESCENDANCY CHART - FALL BRANCH 2

T 3.))))2 Victor George FALL (1902) sp-2 Dorothy RUMBLE (1900)

T

1/)))Q 1 Dorothy Joan FALL (1926)

* sp-1 Joseph DOUGAN (1924)

*T

* 1/)))Q (2) Dorothy Suzanne DOUGAN (1947)

**

sp1-(2) Paul PERNA (1949) **

**

sp2-(2) Thomas Michael FAHERTY (1937) **

* 2/)))Q (2) Jennifer DOUGAN (1950)

** sp- (2) Bruce HOLLAND (1950)

**T

** 1/)))Q (3) Jacqueline R HOLLAND (1971)

*** sp- (3) Afro JUAREZ

***T

*** 1.)))Q (4) Sergio Paulo JUAREZ (1988) ***

** 2/)))Q (3) Bruce HOLLAND (1972)

*** sp- (3) Kristina GIBSON

***T

*** 1.)))Q (4) Samantha HOLLAND (1993) ***

**

3.)))Q (3) Nicolle HOLLAND (1978) ** **

**

sp- (2) UNKNOWN

**T

** 1.)))Q (3) Jason HOLLAND (1987) ** **

* 3/)))Q (2) Mary Joan DOUGAN (1954)

**

sp1- (2) Gary RICHIE **

**

sp2- (2) Ronald KNECHT (1951)

**T

**

1/)))Q (3) Megan KNECHT (1984)

**

2.)))Q (3) Eric KNECHT (1988) **

* 4/)))Q (2) Elizabeth DOUGAN (1957)

** sp-(2) Angelo DIAKOS (1954)

**T

**

1/)))Q (3) Kristina DIAKOS (1978)

**

2.)))Q (3) Maria DIAKOS (1980) **

*

5.)))Q (2) Jane Marie DOUGAN (1960)

*

sp-(2)Erin Patrick COLLINS (1961)

*T

*

1/)))Q (3) Jessica COLLINS

*

2.)))Q (3) Theresa COLLINS * *

2.)))Q 1 John Victor FALL sp-1 Kathleen Mary MELSON T 1/)))Q (2) Judith Anne FALL

+)))))))))), (1983) * JOSEPH * (1986) * MELSON *

* BRANCH *

* page 683 * (1928) .))))0)))))- (1926)S)))))))-

(1955)

* sp-(2) Ian Peter OZANNE (1954)

*T

*

1/)))Q (3) Benjamin Ian OZANNE (1979)

*

2.)))Q (3) Sasha Joy OZANNE (1983) *

2.)))Q (2) Peter John FALL (1957) sp-(2) Lee Heather BAKER (1959)

T 1/)))Q (3) Shannon Jean FALL (1979) 2/)))Q (3) Michelle Kathleen FALL (1981) 3/)))Q (3) Christopher John FALL (1982) 4.)))Q (3) Amy Elizabeth FALL (1989)

663

APPENDIX C: FAMILY ANCESTRY AND DESCENDANCY CHARTS

DESCENDANCY CHART - McNAMARA BRANCH

Unknown MCNAMARA sp-UNKNOWN

T .)))Q John MCNAMARA sp-UNKNOWN

T /)))Q 3: Emily Louise MCNAMARA (1870)

* sp1-3: George Edward FALL (1850)

*T * * +)))))))))))))))))))))))), * .)))))))))1 FALL BRANCH 1 page 659 *

* .))))))))))))))))))))))))- *

*

sp2-3: John William DUNKLEY * /)))Q 3: Unknown MCNAMARA

*

sp-3: Unknown WELLS

*T

* /)))Q 2: Louise WELLS

** sp-2: UNKNOWN

**T

*

* .)))Q 1: Linda UNKNOWN **

*

.)))Q Unknown WELLS * /)))Q 3:Victor Hugh MCNAMARA (1879)

*

sp1-3: Ellaline D BOLTON (1902)

*T

*

.)))Q 2: Patrick MCNAMARA (1924)

*

sp-2: Diana Naomi V JONES (1933)

*T

* /)))Q 1: Sarah Ruth MCNAMARA (1957)

** sp-1: Andrew NICHOLLS

* *T

*

* .)))Q (2)Jonnee Oskar NICHOLLS (1989) **

*

/)))Q 1: Andrew P MCNAMARA (1959)

** sp-1: Jaqueline May SKELTON

* *T

*

* /)))Q (2) Aaron David MCNAMARA (1985)

*

* .)))Q (2) Natasha Y MCNAMARA (1988) **

*

.)))Q 1: Jennifer Anne MCNAMARA (1972) * .)))Q 3: Tilly MCNAMARA

sp-3: William CHARLESWORTH

664

APPENDIX C

DESCENDANCY CHART - RUMBLE BRANCH 1

1--5: Thomas RUMBLE (1791) King Edward I sp1-5: UNKNOWN Margaret of France

T* 1 /)))Q Louisa RUMBLE (1826) Thomas de Brotherton

2-6.)))Q Five other Unknown RUMBLE children (1300 - 1338) T R

Many generations later Thomas de Brotherton

T sp2-5: Frances DE BROTHERTON (1793)))))))))))))))- T 1/)))Q 4: Jane RUMBLE (1829)

* sp-4: Henry WEBB

*T

* 1.)))Q 3: Harry (John?) WEBB

* 2/)))Q 4: John Thomas RUMBLE (1829)

* sp-4: Ann BLOWER

* 3/)))Q 4: Thomas William RUMBLE (1832)

* sp1-4: Lydia Mary SPICER

*T

*

.)))Q 3: Four Unknown RUMBLE children *

*

sp2-4: Sarah Elizabeth HOARE

*T

* 1.)))Q 3: Emily Beatrice RUMBLE

* 4/)))Q 4: Henry Euean RUMBLE

+))))))))))))))), (1883) *HUMFREY BRANCH * * page 673 * (1834) .))))))0))))))))-

* sp-4: Grace Martha HUMFREY (1839)S))))))))))-

*T

*

1/)))Q 3: Henry RUMBLE (1861) **

*

2/)))Q 3: Grace D RUMBLE (1862)

** sp-3: Robert William WALL **

*

3/)))Q 3: Unknown RUMBLE

*

4/)))Q 3: Eueanita Blanche RUMBLE

+)))))))))))))), (1863) *KNIGHT BRANCH * (1864) * page 674 *

* .)))))))0))))))- * 5/)))Q 3: Harry Humfrey RUMBLE (1866) *

** sp-3: Kate Rosaline KNIGHT (1866)S)))))))))))))-

* * T +))))))))))))))))))))))))),

* * .)))))))1 RUMBLE BRANCH 2 page 663*

* * .)))))))))))))))))))))))))-

* 6/)))Q 3: Herbert Montague RUMBLE (1868)

** sp-3: Mary Georgina KNIGHT (1872)

* * T +))))))))))))))))))))))))),

* * .)))))))1 RUMBLE BRANCH 3 page 669*

* * .)))))))))))))))))))))))))-

*

7/)))Q 3: Frances Mary RUMBLE (1870)

*

8/)))Q 3: Joseph Humfrey RUMBLE (1872) **

*

9/)))Q 3: Ernest Duncan L RUMBLE (1874)

** sp-3: Martha SAELENS (1896)

*

* T +)))))))))))))))))))))))))), * * .)))))))1 RUMBLE BRANCH 4 page 671 *

*

* .))))))))))))))))))))))))))-

* 10/)))Q 3: John Euean RUMBLE (1875)

** sp-3: Gladys Maud SCOTT

*

* T +)))))))))))))))))))))))))), * * .)))))))1 RUMBLE BRANCH 5 page 671 *

*

* .))))))))))))))))))))))))))-

* 11.)))Q 3: Mercy Geraldine RUMBLE (1877)

* 5.)))Q 4: Unknown RUMBLE (1834)

665

APPENDIX C: FAMILY ANCESTRY AND DESCENDANCY CHARTS

DESCENDANCY CHART - RUMBLE BRANCH 2